Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
7
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Faraday Future Inks Battery Pact With LG Chem For Mystery Electric Car[2016/10/04]
-
More favorable conditions for new energy vehicles[2018/03/08]
-
New Power Report: October issue published[2016/10/27]
-
Prime Directive: Is Toyota Embracing Electric Vehicles After All?[2016/11/12]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]